Closing the gender pay gap in emergency medicine: Paradigms to consider for leaders, faculty, and trainees.

The gender pay gap among physicians is a well documented and persistent problem and has a profound impact on earnings over a career lifetime. This paper describes examples of concrete initiatives three institutions took to identify and address gender pay gaps. Salary audits at two academic emergency departments highlight the importance of not only ensuring equity in salary among physicians of the same rank but also monitoring whether women are achieving equal representation at higher academic ranks and leadership, elements that typically contribute to compensation. These audits reveal how senior rank and formal leadership roles are significantly associated with salary disparities. A third school of medicine-wide initiative entailed conducting comprehensive salary audits followed by review and adjustment of faculty compensation to achieve pay equity. Graduating residents and fellows seeking first jobs out of training and faculty looking to be compensated equitably would benefit from understanding the elements that drive their compensation and advocating for frameworks that are understandable and transparent.

COVID-19 Seroprevalence in ED Health Care Professionals Study: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: ED health care professionals are at the frontline of evaluation and management of patients with acute, and often undifferentiated, illness. During the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, there were concerns that ED health care professionals may have been at increased risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 due to difficulty in early identification of patients. This study assessed the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among ED health care professionals without confirmed history of COVID-19 infection at a quaternary academic medical center. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional design. An ED health care professional was deemed eligible if they had worked at least 4 shifts in the adult emergency department from April 1, 2020, through May 31, 2020, were asymptomatic on the day of blood draw, and were not known to have had prior documented COVID-19 infection. The study period was December 17, 2020, to January 27, 2021. Eligible participants completed a questionnaire and had a blood sample drawn. Samples were run on the Roche Cobas Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay. RESULTS: Of 103 health care professionals (16 attending physicians, 4 emergency residents, 16 advanced practice professionals, and 67 full-time emergency nurses), only 3 (2.9%; exact 95% CI, 0.6%-8.3%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. DISCUSSION: At this quaternary academic medical center, among those who volunteered to take an antibody test, there was a low seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among ED clinicians who were asymptomatic at the time of blood draw and not known to have had prior COVID-19 infection.

Measuring without a ruler: Limited data to characterize the relationship between physician assistant/nurse practitioner staffing and emergency department performance.

OBJECTIVE: Physician assistant (PA) and nurse practitioner (NP) staffing is increasingly common in emergency departments (EDs), with variable physician supervision. We examined the feasibility of using publicly reported metrics as a measure of ED performance by staffing model. METHODS: We classified a convenience sample of 915 EDs by staffing model using the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA 2016 and a follow-up survey. Staffing models included 24/7 attending coverage with PAs/NPs, 24/7 attending coverage without PAs/NPs, and PAs/NPs without 24/7 attending coverage. We linked EDs with Hospital Compare data to examine availability of metrics and compared metric performance by staffing model. We used regression modeling to examine the independent relationship between staffing model and ED performance after adjusting for ED characteristics. RESULTS: Of 915 EDs surveyed, 767 (83%) responded and 436 (48%) had complete staffing data and any Hospital Compare data. The 216 EDs without any Hospital Compare data more frequently had no 24/7 attending coverage, were smaller, and were more often rural. Of 5 clinical metrics, 3 had data from < 100 EDs (range: 2%-21%), and 2 had data from 0 EDs. Of the 5 clinical metrics, only median time-to-ECG had enough data for analysis and found no difference among staffing models. Among the 3 process metrics, only time to discharge was significantly faster in EDs with any PA/NP staffing. CONCLUSION: Many EDs in our national sample lacked sufficient Hospital Compare data to evaluate performance, likely because of lower patient volumes for condition-specific metrics. Alternative strategies to measure quality of care delivery in these settings should be developed.

Advanced practice providers proficiency-based model of ultrasound training and practice in the ED.

Competency in the application of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has come to be an expected fundamental skill set for advanced practice providers (APPs) in the emergency department. Both American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society of Emergency Medicine Physician Assistants approve of and endorse POCUS use by APPs. However, clinical exposure to and practice of ultrasound in this setting is often variable and without structure. POCUS training must be evolved into a system where developed skills are compatible with clinical need and expectations of APPs. At our institution, we developed a formal, structured POCUS training program for emergency medicine (EM) APPs (including physician assistants and nurse practitioners) and evaluated its efficacy quantitatively by means of a proficiency index. This report examines the EM POCUS training most common to physician assistants and nurse practitioners before practicing at our institution and explores the components of our POCUS training program that have affected program development.

Advanced practice providers in academic emergency medicine: A national survey of chairs and program directors.

BACKGROUND: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Board of Directors convened a task force to elucidate the current state of workforce, operational, and educational issues being faced by academic medical centers related to advanced practice providers (APPs). The task force surveyed academic emergency department (ED) chairs and residency program directors (PDs). METHODS: The survey was distributed to the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM)-member chairs and their respective residency PDs in 2021. We surveyed 125 chairs with their self-identified PDs. The survey sampled hiring, state-independent practice laws, scope of practice, teaching and supervision, training opportunities, delegation of procedures between physician learners and APPs, and perceptions of the impact on resident and medical student education. RESULTS: Of the AACEM-member chairs identified, 73% responded and 47% of PDs responded. Most (98%) employ either physician assistants or nurse practitioners. Among responding departments, 86% report APPs working in fast-track settings, 80% work in the main ED, and 54% work in the waiting room. In 44% of departments, APPs and residents evaluate patients concurrently, and 2% of respondents reported that APPs manage high-acuity patients without attending involvement. Two-thirds of chairs believe that APPs contribute positively to the quality of patient care, while 44% believe that APPs contribute to the academic environment. One-third of PDs believe that the presence of APPs interferes with resident education. Although 75% of PDs believe that residents require training to work effectively with APPs in the ED, almost half (49%) report zero hours of training around APP supervision or collaborative skills. CONCLUSIONS: APPs are ubiquitous across academic EDs. Future research is required for academic ED leaders to balance physician and APP deployment across the academic ED within the context of patient care, resident education, institutional resources, professional development opportunities for APP staff, and standardization of APP EM training.

Addressing gender inequities: Creation of a multi-institutional consortium of women physicians in academic emergency medicine.

Gender inequity is pervasive in medicine, including emergency medicine (EM), and is well documented in workforce representation, leadership, financial compensation, and resource allocation. The reasons for gender inequities in medicine, including academic EM, are multifactorial and include disadvantageous institutional parental, family, and promotion policies; workplace environment and culture; implicit biases; and a paucity of women physician leader role models, mentors, and sponsors. To address some of the challenges of gender inequities and career advancement for women in academic EM, we established an innovative, peer-driven, multi-institutional consortium of women EM faculty employed at four distinct hospitals affiliated with one medical school. The consortium combined financial and faculty resources to execute gender-specific programs not feasible at an individual institution due to limited funding and faculty availability. The programs included leadership skill-building and negotiation seminars for consortium members. The consortium created a collaborative community designed specifically to enrich career development for women in academic EM, with a formal organizational structure to connect faculty from four hospitals under one academic institution. The objective of this report is to describe the creation of this cross-institutional consortium focused on career development, academic productivity, and networking and sharing best practices for work-life integration for academic EM women faculty. This consortium-building model could be used to enhance existing institutional career development structures for women and other physician communities in academic medicine with unique career advancement challenges.

A Review of Interprofessional Variation in Education: Challenges and Considerations in the Growth of Advanced Practice Providers in Emergency Medicine.

The employment and utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs) in the emergency department has been steadily increasing. Physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs) have vastly different requirements for admission to graduate programs, clinical exposure, and postgraduate training. It is important that as supervisory physicians, patients, hospital administrators, and lawmakers, we understand the differences to best create a collaborative, supportive, and educational framework within which PAs/NPs can work effectively as part of a care team. This paper reviews the trends, considerations, and challenges of an evolving clinician workforce in the specialty of emergency medicine (EM). Subsequently, the following parameters of APP training are examined and discussed: the divergence in physician, PA, and NP education and training; requirements of PA and NP degree programs; variation in clinical contact hours; degree-specific licensing and postgraduate EM certification; opportunities for specialty training; and the evolution and availability of residency programs for APPs. The descriptive review is followed by a discussion of contemporary and timely issues that impact EM and considerations brought forth by the expansion of APPs in EM such as the current drive to independent practice and the push for reimbursement parity. We review current position statements from pertinent professional organizations regarding PA and NP capabilities, responsibilities, and physician oversight as well as billing implications, care outcomes and medicolegal implications.

An Analysis of Ambulance Transport and Out-of-Network Emergency Department Utilization in an Accountable Care Organization.

For hospital-affiliated accountable care organizations (ACOs), emergency care represents a unique challenge for coordination of care and a major source of ACO leakage. The authors analyzed emergency department (ED) visits among ACO members to assess the potential impact of ambulance transport on the use of in-network versus out-of-network EDs. To better understand factors influencing the use of in-network versus out-of-network EDs, 2018 claims data from members of a regional subset of a large ACO in the greater Boston area were analyzed. Within this population, multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ambulance transport as well as demographic factors, insurance type, and hospital distance on the use of in-network versus out-of-network EDs. Arrival to an ED via ambulance was found to be significantly associated with reduced odds of presenting to an in-network ED compared to arriving by private transportation (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.85). Age older than 65 years, commercial insurance (relative to Medicare), proximity to an in-network ED, and distance from an out-of-network ED also were significantly associated with use of in-network EDs relative to out-of-network EDs. Given the central role of the ED as a primary source of hospital admissions in the United States, emergency care represents a key potential target for interventions aimed at reducing patient leakage. Future efforts should aim to identify and evaluate new ways that emergency medical services can be leveraged to promote effective care coordination.

Evaluation of Process Improvement Interventions on Handoff Times between the Emergency Department and Observation Unit.

BACKGROUND: Mitigating hospital crowding requires judicious use of inpatient resources, making Emergency Department Observation Units (EDOUs) an increasingly vital destination for patients that are not suitable for discharge. Maximizing the utility of the EDOU hinges on efficient patient transfers and safe provider communication, which may be accomplished with asynchronous handoff and an emphasis on pull-through operations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an electronic, asynchronous handoff replacing verbal handoff on transfer times from the Emergency Department (ED) to the EDOU. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed with patients transferred to the EDOU throughout several process improvement measures focused on asynchronous handoff. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine the effect that these process improvements had on the time from EDOU bed assignment to patient transfer. RESULTS: There were 14,996 EDOU stays during the 20-month period included in the analysis. Time from EDOU bed assignment to patient transfer decreased significantly with all three interventions studied. An auto-page to the clinicians notifying them of a ready bed reduced the mean time to transfer by 10.1 min (p < 0.0001), asynchronous nursing handoff reduced it by 3.57 min (p = 0.0299), and asynchronous clinician handoff reduced it by 14.67 min (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Introducing automatic pages regarding bed status and converting the handoff process from a verbal model to an asynchronous, electronic handoff were effective ways to reduce the time from bed assignment to transfer out of the ED for patients being sent to the EDOU.

Emergency department falls: a longitudinal analysis of revisits and hospitalisations between patients who fall and patients who did not fall.

OBJECTIVE: Older adult falls are a national issue comprising 3 million emergency department (ED) visits and significant mortality. We sought to understand whether ED revisits and hospitalisations for fallers differed from non-fall patients through a secondary analysis of a longitudinal, statewide cohort of patients. DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis using the non-public Patient Discharge Database and the ED data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. This is a 5-year, longitudinal observational dataset, which was used to assess outcomes for fallers and non-fall patients, defined as anyone who did not carry a fall diagnosis during this time period. SETTING: 2005-2010 non-public Patient Discharge Database and the ED Data from the state of California. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults 65 years and older MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: ED revisits and hospitalisations for fallers and non-fall patients. RESULTS: Patients who came to the ED with an index visit of a fall were more likely to be discharged home after their fall (61.1% vs 45.0%, p<0.001). Fallers who were discharged or hospitalised after their index visit were more likely to come back to the ED for a fall related complaint compared with non-fallers (median time: 151 days vs 352 days, p<0.001 and hospitalised: 45 days vs 119 days, p<0.01) and fallers who were initially discharged also returned to the ED sooner for a non-fall related complaint (median time: 325 days vs 352 days, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Fall patients tend to be discharged home more often after their index visit, but returned to the ED sooner compared with their non-fall counterparts. Given a faller's rates of ED revisits and hospitalisations, EDs should consider a fall as a poor prognostic indicator for future healthcare utilisation.

Utilization of a multidisciplinary emergency department sepsis huddle to reduce time to antibiotics and improve SEP-1 compliance.

Sepsis is a significant public health crisis in the United States, contributing to 50% of inpatient hospital deaths. Given its dramatic health effects and implications in the setting of new CMS care guidelines, ED leaders have renewed focus on appropriate and timely sepsis care, including timely administration of antibiotics in patients at risk for sepsis. Modeling the success of multidisciplinary bedside huddles in improving compliance with appropriate care in other healthcare settings, a Sepsis Huddle was implemented in a large, academic ED, with the goal of driving compliance with standardized sepsis care as described in the CMS SEP-1 measure. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed, with the primary finding that utilization of the Sepsis Huddle resulted in antibiotics being administered on average 41 min sooner than when the Sepsis Huddle was not performed. Given that literature suggests that early administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy is a major driver of mortality reduction in patients with sepsis, this study represents a proof of concept that utilization of a Sepsis Huddle may serve to improve outcomes among ED patients at risk for sepsis.

Keeping Patients at Risk for Self-Harm Safe in the Emergency Department: A Protocolized Approach.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with psychiatric illness are boarding in emergency departments (EDs) for longer periods. Many patients are at high risk of harm to self, and maintaining their safety is critical. The objectives of this study are to describe the development and implementation of a comprehensive safety precautions protocol for ED patients at risk for self-harm and to report the observed changes in rates of self-harm. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed comprehensive safety precautions, including the creation of safe bathrooms, increasing the number and training of observers, protocols to manage access to belongings and for clothing search or removal, and additional interventions for exceptionally high-risk patients. Events of attempted self-harm were measured for 12 months before and after new safety precautions were enacted. RESULTS: In the 12 months prior to the protocol initiation, among 4,408 at-risk patients, there were 13 episodes of attempted self-harm (2.95 per 1,000 at-risk patients), and 6 that resulted in actual self-harm (1.36 per 1,000 at-risk patients). In the 12 months after the protocol was introduced, among the 4,523 at-risk patients, there were 6 episodes of attempted self-harm (1.33 per 1,000 at-risk patients, p = 0.11) and only 1 that resulted in actual self-harm (0.22 per 1,000 at-risk patients, p = 0.07). There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive safety precautions can be successfully developed and implemented in the ED. These precautions correlated with lower, although not statistically significant, rates of self-harm. Further study of similar interventions with adequately powered samples could be beneficial.

The Design and Implementation of a Professional Development Program for Physician Assistants in an Academic Emergency Department.

Physician assistants (PAs) are expanding their role in academic emergency departments (EDs). There are no published models for how to integrate PAs into departmental educational activities, scholarship, and operations outside of a PA residency approach. We created a professional development program for PAs that would provide them with opportunities to integrate into all aspects of our department mission and provide them with a forum for personal growth and ongoing education. The program provides PAs with resources including protected time and mentorship to become a content expert in an academic area of interest. We review our 5-year experience creating and implementing this program, which has grown from six PAs in 2013 to 24 PAs in 2018. These PAs now have formal roles in five of our eight divisions, participating in education, administrative, and research activities. The retention rate for PAs in this program is 90.2% versus 85.7% for PAs at our department who are not in the program. Our experience and results demonstrate the value of investing in the professional development and continued education of PAs at an academic ED versus the traditional model of service and the potential for integration into all aspects of an academic ED's mission.

Integration of Advanced Practice Providers in Academic Emergency Departments: Best Practices and Considerations.

As emergency department (ED) visits continue to increase nationwide, the utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs) has been steadily increasing. Academic centers face unique challenges in the inclusion of APP staff into the educational and teaching environment. Effort should be made to both take advantage of and support the educational mission of academic centers while bolstering clinical care provided by APP staff. This paper highlights some of the considerations and challenges in incorporating APPs into academic EDs as discussed at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, in May 2018. The panel included representation from Massachusetts General Hospital, Yale New Haven Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate. Distillation of our common experience shows that best practices in supervision favor uniformity between resident and APP staff except with low-acuity patients. Likewise, professional development takes advantage of the educational environment to provide feedback and identify areas for improvement as well as development of formal clinical and educational curricula for APPs working in academic institutions. Already established medical doctor residencies can be leveraged to provide postgraduate education for APPs in either formal or informal training programs.

72h returns: A trigger tool for diagnostic error.

BACKGROUND: Patients who return to the Emergency Department (ED) within 72h of discharge are often used for ED Quality Assurance efforts, however little is known about the yield of this kind of review and the types of errors it identifies. Our objective was to identify the prevalence, types and severity of errors in these cases. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who presented to an urban, university affiliated ED between 10/1/2012-9/30/2015 who returned within 72 h requiring hospital admission. RESULTS: There were 413,167 ED visits during the study period with 2001 (0.48%) patients who returned within 72h and were admitted to the hospital. An event requiring further investigation was identified in 59 (2.95%) of these patients and 50 (2.49%) of them were deemed to represent a deviation from optimal care. Of these, 48 (96%) represented diagnostic error. When a standard diagnostic process of care framework was applied to these, the majority of cases represented failures in the initial diagnostic pathway (29 cases, 60.4%). When Error Severity Codes were applied, 16 (32%) resulted in minor harm and 34 (68%) resulted in major harm or death. CONCLUSION: Screening of 72h ED returns has low yield in identifying suboptimal care, with less than 3% of cases representing deviations from standard care. Of these, the majority represent cognitive errors in the diagnostic pathway. These reviews may be useful as a tool for Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of individual clinicians, however likely serve less value in identifying systems issues contributing to unsafe care.

Use of Intranasal Naloxone by Basic Life Support Providers.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Intranasal delivery of naloxone to reverse the effects of opioid overdose by Advanced Life Support (ALS) providers has been studied in several prehospital settings. In 2006, in response to the increase in opioid-related overdoses, a special waiver from the state allowed administration of intranasal naloxone by Basic Life Support (BLS) providers in our city. This study aimed to determine: 1) if patients who received a 2-mg dose of nasal naloxone administered by BLS required repeat dosing while in the emergency department (ED), and 2) the disposition of these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients transported by an inner-city municipal ambulance service to one of three academic medical centers. We included patients aged 18 and older that were transported by ambulance between 1/1/2006 and 12/12/2012 and who received intranasal naloxone by BLS providers as per a state approved protocol. Site investigators matched EMS run data to patients from each hospital's EMR and performed a chart review to confirm that the patient was correctly identified and to record the outcomes of interest. Descriptive statistics were then generated. RESULTS: A total of 793 patients received nasal naloxone by BLS and were transported to three hospitals. ALS intervened and transported 116 (14.6%) patients, and 11 (1.4%) were intubated in the field. There were 724 (91.3%) patients successfully matched to an ED chart. Hospital A received 336 (46.4%) patients, Hospital B received 210 (29.0%) patients, and Hospital C received 178 (24.6%) patients. Mean age was 36.2 (SD 10.5) years and 522 (72.1%) were male; 702 (97.1%) were reported to have abused heroin while 21 (2.9%) used other opioids. Nasal naloxone had an effect per the prehospital record in 689 (95.2%) patients. An additional naloxone dose was given in the ED to 64 (8.8%) patients. ED dispositions were: 507 (70.0%) discharged, 105 (14.5%) admitted, and 112 (15.5%) other (e.g., left against medical advice, left without being seen, or transferred). CONCLUSIONS: Only a small percentage of patients receiving prehospital administration of nasal naloxone by BLS providers required additional doses of naloxone in the ED and the majority of patients were discharged.

Clinical Interventions to Reduce Preventable Hospital Readmission After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Hospital readmissions are common and costly and, in some cases, may be related to problems with care processes. We sought to reduce readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large tertiary care facility through programs to target vulnerabilities predischarge, after discharge, and during re-presentation to the emergency department. During initial hospitalization, we assessed patients' readmission risk with a validated risk score and used a discharge checklist to ensure access to appropriate medications and close follow-up for high-risk patients. We also developed patient education videos about chest discomfort and heart failure. After discharge, we established a new follow-up clinic with cardiology fellows. A computerized system was developed to automatically notify cardiologists when patients presented to the emergency department within 30 days of PCI to enhance patient access to cardiology care in the emergency department. Early cardiologist assessment and assistance with triage was encouraged, and the emergency department used a risk stratification algorithm derived from a local database of patients to triage patients presenting with chest discomfort after PCI. We tracked the number of patients readmitted after PCI to our hospital. With our interventions, from 2011 to 2015, the index hospital readmission rate has declined from 9.6% to 5.3%. This program could provide tangible structural changes that can be implemented in other healthcare centers, both reducing the cost of care and improving the quality of care for patients with PCI.

Tourniquet Use in a Civilian Emergency Medical Services Setting: A Descriptive Analysis of the Boston EMS Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the resurgence of early tourniquet use for control of exsanguinating limb hemorrhage in the military setting, its appropriate role in civilian emergency medical services (EMS) has been less clear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of prehospital tourniquet use in an urban, civilian EMS setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of EMS prehospital care reports was performed from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2012. Data, including the time duration of prehospital tourniquet placement, EMS scene time, mechanisms of injury, and patient demographics, underwent descriptive analysis. Outcomes data for participating receiving hospitals were also reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight cases of prehospital tourniquet use were identified. The most common causes of injury were penetrating gunshot or stabbing wounds (67.4%, 66/98); 7.1% (7/98) of cases were due to blunt trauma; 23.5% (23/98) of cases were from nontraumatic hemorrhage related to uncontrolled hemodialysis shunt or wound bleeding; 45.4% (44/97) of cases were placed on a lower extremity; 54.6% (53/97) were placed on an upper extremity. Placement was successful in hemorrhage control in 91% (87/95, 95%CI: 85.9-97.3%) of cases. The average prehospital tourniquet placement time was 14.9 minutes. Half of all tourniquet placements were performed by basic life support providers. Hospital follow-up was available for 96.9% (95/98) of cases. Of these, the tourniquet was removed by EMS in 3.2% (3/95), the emergency department in 54.7% (52/95), or in the operating room (OR) in 31.6% (30/95) of the time; 46.7% (14/30) of these OR cases had a documented vascular injury needing repair. Ten deaths with hospital follow-up data were identified, none of which were due to tourniquet use. There was one case of forearm numbness potentially due to nerve injury and one case with potential vascular complication, representing an overall complication rate of 2.1% (2/95). CONCLUSION: The early use of tourniquets for extremity hemorrhage in an urban civilian EMS setting appears to be safe, with complications occurring infrequently.